• If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • Buried in cloud files? We can help with Spring cleaning!

    Whether you use Dropbox, Drive, G-Suite, OneDrive, Gmail, Slack, Notion, or all of the above, Dokkio will organize your files for you. Try Dokkio (from the makers of PBworks) for free today.

  • Dokkio (from the makers of PBworks) was #2 on Product Hunt! Check out what people are saying by clicking here.

View
 

Overview of project methodology

Page history last edited by Anna Gruszczynska 11 years, 8 months ago

This page introduces project methodology, focusing on the stages in the process of "opening up" social sciences teaching materials. You can either follow the links from this page or use the sidebar in order to learn more about each of these stages, from auditing the materials, reflecting and reviewing, through mapping, pulling together case studies and depositing the materials.

 

 

The C-SAP OER project worked with a small cluster of academic staff - 6 partners across 6 different HEIs and across 4 social science subject areas-, within the aegis of a Communities of Practice model (its application will be fully articulated in the publications arising from the project) , in order to explore processes around the release and sharing of modular teaching content. Our approach was to work closely with the project partners, supported by a project consultant and iterative evaluation. We combined face to face meetings with other means of support and communication, and our central workspace area was based around this wiki, which became a holding space for the partners’ modular content and also a workspace to carry out activities set by the project team, including peer supported review of materials, discussion around pedagogical frameworks.

 

 

The ‘raw’ materials from this project (the modular content offered by our partners at the outset of the project) were discussed with the project coordinator in the early stages of the project during the auditing process. These discussions began to outline a narrative or history around the materials, such as the length of time the module had been offered, what kinds of changes had been made in light of feedback and review, what kinds of student cohort took the module and how it was delivered. The project partners then had a chance to take part in a peer-supported development activity, where they reflected on issues pertinent to Open Educational Resources and ways in which their own teaching materials could move towards being open and shareable.These reflexive discussions in turn informed our thinking in terms of creating a ‘mapping’ framework which can help to expose and reveal pedagogical decisions about the creation and potentials for (re)-using the materials. The issues raised through the reflexive review and mapping activities were then explored further in developing a case study around each partner and their own experience of the process.  Following these discussions around the materials, and any interventions due to copyright and formatting, the materials were released into JORUM Open, as well as the MERLOT repository.

 

Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England & Wales

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.